Impacts of long-term cassava-based conservation agriculture systems on soil greenhouse gas emissions in Cambodia

Although cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) is regarded as an important food and energy crop, the effects of its cultivation on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions remain poorly documented. This study, conducted in a tropical red Oxisol in Cambodia, quantified the effects of long-term cassava-based cropping systems on soil methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions using static chambers over two years (2022–24). Also accounting for measured change in soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks, the greenhouse gas balance (in CO2-eq) of the systems was determined. Established in 2009, the replicated treatments included: (1) conventional tillage mono-cropping cassava (CTM-Cs), (2) no-till mono-cropping cassava with biomass retention (NTM-Cs), and (3) no-till bi-annual cassava-maize rotation with cover crops (NTR), where cassava (Cs) and maize (Mz) are grown in two separate plots: NTR1 and NTR2. CH4-C emissions ranged from –123 to +141 µg CH4-C m–2 hr–1, with negligible cumulative emissions (–1.76 to +0.94 kg CH4-C ha–1 yr–1), depending on cropping systems and season. In cassava treatments, N2O-N emissions peaked after mineral fertilizer application (up to +141 µg N2O-N m–2 hr–1), while maize treatment showed the higher peaks (up to +437.18 µg N2O-N m–2 hr–1) after cover crop termination under NTR. Cassava treatments had lower (p  0.05) than CTM-Cs and NTM-Cs, respectively. Accounting for CH4 and N2O emissions and annual SOC accumulation, NTM-Cs, NTR1 and NTR2 systems (2022–24) resulted in a net climate mitigation benefit by sequestering –3.52, –1.93 and –3.16 Mg CO2-eq ha–1 yr–1, respectively. Our results showed that while N2O emissions were consistently higher in the treatment characterized by greater cover crop residue quantity and quality, they only slightly offset the climate benefits due to increased SOC stocks. Overall, the findings underscore the potential of NT systems for sustainable cassava production and climate change mitigation.

Data and Resources

Additional Info

Field Value
Type of ALiSEA product None
Title Impacts of long-term cassava-based conservation agriculture systems on soil greenhouse gas emissions in Cambodia
Description Although cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) is regarded as an important food and energy crop, the effects of its cultivation on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions remain poorly documented. This study, conducted in a tropical red Oxisol in Cambodia, quantified the effects of long-term cassava-based cropping systems on soil methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions using static chambers over two years (2022–24). Also accounting for measured change in soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks, the greenhouse gas balance (in CO2-eq) of the systems was determined. Established in 2009, the replicated treatments included: (1) conventional tillage mono-cropping cassava (CTM-Cs), (2) no-till mono-cropping cassava with biomass retention (NTM-Cs), and (3) no-till bi-annual cassava-maize rotation with cover crops (NTR), where cassava (Cs) and maize (Mz) are grown in two separate plots: NTR1 and NTR2. CH4-C emissions ranged from –123 to +141 µg CH4-C m–2 hr–1, with negligible cumulative emissions (–1.76 to +0.94 kg CH4-C ha–1 yr–1), depending on cropping systems and season. In cassava treatments, N2O-N emissions peaked after mineral fertilizer application (up to +141 µg N2O-N m–2 hr–1), while maize treatment showed the higher peaks (up to +437.18 µg N2O-N m–2 hr–1) after cover crop termination under NTR. Cassava treatments had lower (p < 0.05) average cumulative N2O-N emissions (0.74–0.87 kg N2O-N ha–1 yr–1) than maize (1.42 kg N2O-N ha–1 yr–1). With similar yield-scaled CH4 and N2O emissions, cassava yield under NTR-Cs was 20–30% higher (p > 0.05) than CTM-Cs and NTM-Cs, respectively. Accounting for CH4 and N2O emissions and annual SOC accumulation, NTM-Cs, NTR1 and NTR2 systems (2022–24) resulted in a net climate mitigation benefit by sequestering –3.52, –1.93 and –3.16 Mg CO2-eq ha–1 yr–1, respectively. Our results showed that while N2O emissions were consistently higher in the treatment characterized by greater cover crop residue quantity and quality, they only slightly offset the climate benefits due to increased SOC stocks. Overall, the findings underscore the potential of NT systems for sustainable cassava production and climate change mitigation.
Agroecology Category
  • Soil health
  • Climate
Agroecology Keyword
  • Cover crop
  • Monocrop
  • Soil degradation reduction
  • Tillage reduction
  • Greenhouse gas reduction
Contributing organisations AIDA, University of Montpellier, CIRAD, Montpellier, France / CIRAD / General Directorate of Agriculture, MAFF / Northern Mountainous Agriculture - and Forestry Science Institute, Phu Ho commune, Phu Tho District, Phu Tho, Viet Nam / Department of Environmental Systems Sciences, ETH Zurich, 8092, Switzerland / Royal University of Agriculture, Phnom Penh, Cambodia / Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA / University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
Author Vira Leng, Laurent Thuriès, Vang Seng, Florent Tivet , Phearum Mark, Chhay Ngin, Try Yorn, Titouan Filloux, Pascal Lienhard, Johan Six, Lyda Hok, Stéphane Boulakia, Manuel Reyes, P.V. Vara Prasad k l , Rémi Cardinael b m
Year 2026
Type of document Scientific & Research
Language English
Country Cambodia
Administrative Level 1
Administrative Level 2
Web Link https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2026.110363