Additional Information

Field Value
Data last updated November 12, 2024
Metadata last updated August 12, 2025
Created November 12, 2024
Format PDF
License License Not Specified
Datastore activeFalse
Datastore contains all records of source fileFalse
Has viewsTrue
Idcde71190-243a-44e7-9a60-5413ff10256a
Mimetypeapplication/pdf
Name translated{'en': 'Organic by default: Myth or Reality? Evidence from Lao PDR ', 'km': 'Organic by default: Myth or Reality? Evidence from Lao PDR ', 'lo': 'Organic by default: Myth or Reality? Evidence from the Lao PDR ', 'my_MM': 'Organic by default: Myth or Reality? Evidence from the Lao PDR ', 'vi': 'Organic by default: Myth or Reality? Evidence from Lao PDR '}
Package id73300d73-d269-4e88-a8c7-8b3021f1523e
Position0
Resource description{'en': 'The study “Organic by Default: Myth or Reality? Evidence from the Lao PDR” analyzes the impact of certified organic rice farming under a Helvetas project. Comparing organic, ex-organic, and non-organic farmers, it finds that certified farmers are generally younger, more educated, and better endowed, with improved farming and marketing practices and higher prices. However, organic farming proved unsustainable for the most vulnerable, leading some to drop out, showing that certification is not suitable for everyone.', 'km': 'The study “Organic by Default: Myth or Reality? Evidence from the Lao PDR” analyzes the impact of certified organic rice farming under a Helvetas project. Comparing organic, ex-organic, and non-organic farmers, it finds that certified farmers are generally younger, more educated, and better endowed, with improved farming and marketing practices and higher prices. However, organic farming proved unsustainable for the most vulnerable, leading some to drop out, showing that certification is not suitable for everyone.', 'lo': 'The study “Organic by Default: Myth or Reality? Evidence from the Lao PDR” analyzes the impact of certified organic rice farming under a Helvetas project. Comparing organic, ex-organic, and non-organic farmers, it finds that certified farmers are generally younger, more educated, and better endowed, with improved farming and marketing practices and higher prices. However, organic farming proved unsustainable for the most vulnerable, leading some to drop out, showing that certification is not suitable for everyone.', 'my_MM': 'The study “Organic by Default: Myth or Reality? Evidence from the Lao PDR” analyzes the impact of certified organic rice farming under a Helvetas project. Comparing organic, ex-organic, and non-organic farmers, it finds that certified farmers are generally younger, more educated, and better endowed, with improved farming and marketing practices and higher prices. However, organic farming proved unsustainable for the most vulnerable, leading some to drop out, showing that certification is not suitable for everyone.', 'vi': 'The study “Organic by Default: Myth or Reality? Evidence from the Lao PDR” analyzes the impact of certified organic rice farming under a Helvetas project. Comparing organic, ex-organic, and non-organic farmers, it finds that certified farmers are generally younger, more educated, and better endowed, with improved farming and marketing practices and higher prices. However, organic farming proved unsustainable for the most vulnerable, leading some to drop out, showing that certification is not suitable for everyone.'}
Size768.8 KiB
Stateactive
Url typeupload
Name Organic by default: Myth or Reality? Evidence from Lao PDR
Description

The study “Organic by Default: Myth or Reality? Evidence from the Lao PDR” analyzes the impact of certified organic rice farming under a Helvetas project. Comparing organic, ex-organic, and non-organic farmers, it finds that certified farmers are generally younger, more educated, and better endowed, with improved farming and marketing practices and higher prices. However, organic farming proved unsustainable for the most vulnerable, leading some to drop out, showing that certification is not suitable for everyone.