Additional Information

Field Value
Data last updated November 12, 2024
Metadata last updated July 22, 2025
Created November 12, 2024
Format PDF
License License not specified
Datastore activeFalse
Datastore contains all records of source fileFalse
Has viewsTrue
Id322b0bc8-08ae-4bfa-8957-6564b3cf3315
Mimetypeapplication/pdf
Name translated{'en': 'Who Will Feed Us? The Industrial Food Chain vs. The Peasant Food Web', 'km': 'Who Will Feed Us? The Industrial Food Chain vs. The Peasant Food Web', 'lo': 'Who Will Feed Us? The Industrial Food Chain vs. The Peasant Food Web', 'my_MM': 'Who Will Feed Us? The Industrial Food Chain vs. The Peasant Food Web', 'vi': 'Who Will Feed Us? The Industrial Food Chain vs. The Peasant Food Web'}
Package ida035c1e5-8e51-4978-96a1-0a0d0cd68b9c
Position0
Resource description{'en': '1 - Peasants are the main or sole\r\nfood providers to more than\r\n70% of the world’s people, and\r\npeasants produce this food with\r\nless (often much less) than 25%\r\nof the resources – including\r\nland, water, fossil fuels – used\r\nto get all of the world’s food to\r\nthe table. \r\n\r\n2 - The Industrial Food Chain uses\r\nat least 75% of the world’s\r\nagricultural resources and is a\r\nmajor source of GHG emissions,\r\nbut provides food to less than\r\n30% of the world’s people. \r\n\r\n3 - For every $1 consumers pay to\r\nChain retailers, society pays\r\nanother $2 for the Chain’s\r\nhealth and environmental\r\ndamages. The total bill for the\r\nChain’s direct and indirect cost\r\nis 5 times governments’ annual\r\nmilitary expenditure. \r\n\r\n4 - The Chain lacks the agility to\r\nrespond to climate change.\r\nIts R&D is not only distorted\r\nbut also declining as it\r\nconcentrates the global food\r\nmarket. \r\n\r\n5 - The Peasant Food Web\r\nnurtures 9-100 times the\r\nbiodiversity used by the Chain,\r\nacross plants, livestock, fish\r\nand forests. Peasants have\r\nthe knowledge, innovative\r\nenergy and networks needed to\r\nrespond to climate change; they\r\nhave the operational scope and\r\nscale; and they are closest to\r\nthe hungry and malnourished. \r\n\r\n6 - There is still much about\r\nour food systems that we\r\ndon’t know we don’t know.\r\nSometimes, the Chain knows\r\nbut isn’t telling. Other times,\r\npolicymakers aren’t looking.\r\nMost often, we fail to consider\r\nthe diverse knowledge systems\r\nin the Peasant Food Web. \r\n\r\n7 - The bottom line: at least 3.9\r\nbillion people are either hungry\r\nor malnourished because the\r\nIndustrial Food Chain is too\r\ndistorted, vastly too expensive,\r\nand – after 70 years of trying –\r\njust can’t scale up to feed the\r\nworld.', 'km': '1 - Peasants are the main or sole\r\nfood providers to more than\r\n70% of the world’s people, and\r\npeasants produce this food with\r\nless (often much less) than 25%\r\nof the resources – including\r\nland, water, fossil fuels – used\r\nto get all of the world’s food to\r\nthe table. \r\n\r\n2 - The Industrial Food Chain uses\r\nat least 75% of the world’s\r\nagricultural resources and is a\r\nmajor source of GHG emissions,\r\nbut provides food to less than\r\n30% of the world’s people. \r\n\r\n3 - For every $1 consumers pay to\r\nChain retailers, society pays\r\nanother $2 for the Chain’s\r\nhealth and environmental\r\ndamages. The total bill for the\r\nChain’s direct and indirect cost\r\nis 5 times governments’ annual\r\nmilitary expenditure. \r\n\r\n4 - The Chain lacks the agility to\r\nrespond to climate change.\r\nIts R&D is not only distorted\r\nbut also declining as it\r\nconcentrates the global food\r\nmarket. \r\n\r\n5 - The Peasant Food Web\r\nnurtures 9-100 times the\r\nbiodiversity used by the Chain,\r\nacross plants, livestock, fish\r\nand forests. Peasants have\r\nthe knowledge, innovative\r\nenergy and networks needed to\r\nrespond to climate change; they\r\nhave the operational scope and\r\nscale; and they are closest to\r\nthe hungry and malnourished. \r\n\r\n6 - There is still much about\r\nour food systems that we\r\ndon’t know we don’t know.\r\nSometimes, the Chain knows\r\nbut isn’t telling. Other times,\r\npolicymakers aren’t looking.\r\nMost often, we fail to consider\r\nthe diverse knowledge systems\r\nin the Peasant Food Web. \r\n\r\n7 - The bottom line: at least 3.9\r\nbillion people are either hungry\r\nor malnourished because the\r\nIndustrial Food Chain is too\r\ndistorted, vastly too expensive,\r\nand – after 70 years of trying –\r\njust can’t scale up to feed the\r\nworld.', 'lo': '1 - Peasants are the main or sole\r\nfood providers to more than\r\n70% of the world’s people, and\r\npeasants produce this food with\r\nless (often much less) than 25%\r\nof the resources – including\r\nland, water, fossil fuels – used\r\nto get all of the world’s food to\r\nthe table. \r\n\r\n2 - The Industrial Food Chain uses\r\nat least 75% of the world’s\r\nagricultural resources and is a\r\nmajor source of GHG emissions,\r\nbut provides food to less than\r\n30% of the world’s people. \r\n\r\n3 - For every $1 consumers pay to\r\nChain retailers, society pays\r\nanother $2 for the Chain’s\r\nhealth and environmental\r\ndamages. The total bill for the\r\nChain’s direct and indirect cost\r\nis 5 times governments’ annual\r\nmilitary expenditure. \r\n\r\n4 - The Chain lacks the agility to\r\nrespond to climate change.\r\nIts R&D is not only distorted\r\nbut also declining as it\r\nconcentrates the global food\r\nmarket. \r\n\r\n5 - The Peasant Food Web\r\nnurtures 9-100 times the\r\nbiodiversity used by the Chain,\r\nacross plants, livestock, fish\r\nand forests. Peasants have\r\nthe knowledge, innovative\r\nenergy and networks needed to\r\nrespond to climate change; they\r\nhave the operational scope and\r\nscale; and they are closest to\r\nthe hungry and malnourished. \r\n\r\n6 - There is still much about\r\nour food systems that we\r\ndon’t know we don’t know.\r\nSometimes, the Chain knows\r\nbut isn’t telling. Other times,\r\npolicymakers aren’t looking.\r\nMost often, we fail to consider\r\nthe diverse knowledge systems\r\nin the Peasant Food Web. \r\n\r\n7 - The bottom line: at least 3.9\r\nbillion people are either hungry\r\nor malnourished because the\r\nIndustrial Food Chain is too\r\ndistorted, vastly too expensive,\r\nand – after 70 years of trying –\r\njust can’t scale up to feed the\r\nworld.', 'my_MM': '1 - Peasants are the main or sole\r\nfood providers to more than\r\n70% of the world’s people, and\r\npeasants produce this food with\r\nless (often much less) than 25%\r\nof the resources – including\r\nland, water, fossil fuels – used\r\nto get all of the world’s food to\r\nthe table. \r\n\r\n2 - The Industrial Food Chain uses\r\nat least 75% of the world’s\r\nagricultural resources and is a\r\nmajor source of GHG emissions,\r\nbut provides food to less than\r\n30% of the world’s people. \r\n\r\n3 - For every $1 consumers pay to\r\nChain retailers, society pays\r\nanother $2 for the Chain’s\r\nhealth and environmental\r\ndamages. The total bill for the\r\nChain’s direct and indirect cost\r\nis 5 times governments’ annual\r\nmilitary expenditure. \r\n\r\n4 - The Chain lacks the agility to\r\nrespond to climate change.\r\nIts R&D is not only distorted\r\nbut also declining as it\r\nconcentrates the global food\r\nmarket. \r\n\r\n5 - The Peasant Food Web\r\nnurtures 9-100 times the\r\nbiodiversity used by the Chain,\r\nacross plants, livestock, fish\r\nand forests. Peasants have\r\nthe knowledge, innovative\r\nenergy and networks needed to\r\nrespond to climate change; they\r\nhave the operational scope and\r\nscale; and they are closest to\r\nthe hungry and malnourished. \r\n\r\n6 - There is still much about\r\nour food systems that we\r\ndon’t know we don’t know.\r\nSometimes, the Chain knows\r\nbut isn’t telling. Other times,\r\npolicymakers aren’t looking.\r\nMost often, we fail to consider\r\nthe diverse knowledge systems\r\nin the Peasant Food Web. \r\n\r\n7 - The bottom line: at least 3.9\r\nbillion people are either hungry\r\nor malnourished because the\r\nIndustrial Food Chain is too\r\ndistorted, vastly too expensive,\r\nand – after 70 years of trying –\r\njust can’t scale up to feed the\r\nworld.', 'vi': '1 - Peasants are the main or sole\r\nfood providers to more than\r\n70% of the world’s people, and\r\npeasants produce this food with\r\nless (often much less) than 25%\r\nof the resources – including\r\nland, water, fossil fuels – used\r\nto get all of the world’s food to\r\nthe table. \r\n\r\n2 - The Industrial Food Chain uses\r\nat least 75% of the world’s\r\nagricultural resources and is a\r\nmajor source of GHG emissions,\r\nbut provides food to less than\r\n30% of the world’s people. \r\n\r\n3 - For every $1 consumers pay to\r\nChain retailers, society pays\r\nanother $2 for the Chain’s\r\nhealth and environmental\r\ndamages. The total bill for the\r\nChain’s direct and indirect cost\r\nis 5 times governments’ annual\r\nmilitary expenditure. \r\n\r\n4 - The Chain lacks the agility to\r\nrespond to climate change.\r\nIts R&D is not only distorted\r\nbut also declining as it\r\nconcentrates the global food\r\nmarket. \r\n\r\n5 - The Peasant Food Web\r\nnurtures 9-100 times the\r\nbiodiversity used by the Chain,\r\nacross plants, livestock, fish\r\nand forests. Peasants have\r\nthe knowledge, innovative\r\nenergy and networks needed to\r\nrespond to climate change; they\r\nhave the operational scope and\r\nscale; and they are closest to\r\nthe hungry and malnourished. \r\n\r\n6 - There is still much about\r\nour food systems that we\r\ndon’t know we don’t know.\r\nSometimes, the Chain knows\r\nbut isn’t telling. Other times,\r\npolicymakers aren’t looking.\r\nMost often, we fail to consider\r\nthe diverse knowledge systems\r\nin the Peasant Food Web. \r\n\r\n7 - The bottom line: at least 3.9\r\nbillion people are either hungry\r\nor malnourished because the\r\nIndustrial Food Chain is too\r\ndistorted, vastly too expensive,\r\nand – after 70 years of trying –\r\njust can’t scale up to feed the\r\nworld.'}
Size1.3 MiB
Stateactive
Url typeupload
Name Who Will Feed Us? The Industrial Food Chain vs. The Peasant Food Web
Description

1 - Peasants are the main or sole food providers to more than 70% of the world’s people, and peasants produce this food with less (often much less) than 25% of the resources – including land, water, fossil fuels – used to get all of the world’s food to the table.

2 - The Industrial Food Chain uses at least 75% of the world’s agricultural resources and is a major source of GHG emissions, but provides food to less than 30% of the world’s people.

3 - For every $1 consumers pay to Chain retailers, society pays another $2 for the Chain’s health and environmental damages. The total bill for the Chain’s direct and indirect cost is 5 times governments’ annual military expenditure.

4 - The Chain lacks the agility to respond to climate change. Its R&D is not only distorted but also declining as it concentrates the global food market.

5 - The Peasant Food Web nurtures 9-100 times the biodiversity used by the Chain, across plants, livestock, fish and forests. Peasants have the knowledge, innovative energy and networks needed to respond to climate change; they have the operational scope and scale; and they are closest to the hungry and malnourished.

6 - There is still much about our food systems that we don’t know we don’t know. Sometimes, the Chain knows but isn’t telling. Other times, policymakers aren’t looking. Most often, we fail to consider the diverse knowledge systems in the Peasant Food Web.

7 - The bottom line: at least 3.9 billion people are either hungry or malnourished because the Industrial Food Chain is too distorted, vastly too expensive, and – after 70 years of trying – just can’t scale up to feed the world.