Additional Information

Field Value
Data last updated November 12, 2024
Metadata last updated August 21, 2025
Created November 12, 2024
Format PDF
License Creative Commons Share-Alike 4.0
Datastore activeFalse
Datastore contains all records of source fileFalse
Has viewsTrue
Id9573b579-2e69-408b-9135-5e30dcd9a028
Mimetypeapplication/pdf
Name translated{'en': 'The diversity of knowledge, Reflections on the Agrobiodiversity@knowledged programme ', 'km': 'The diversity of knowledge, Reflections on the Agrobiodiversity@knowledged programme ', 'lo': 'The diversity of knowledge, Reflections on the Agrobiodiversity@knowledged programme ', 'my_MM': 'The diversity of knowledge, Reflections on the Agrobiodiversity@knowledged programme ', 'vi': 'The diversity of knowledge, Reflections on the Agrobiodiversity@knowledged programme '}
Package ida2cbecba-c2f5-4707-8e7f-435937f5fa8d
Position0
Resource description{'en': 'Different knowledge paradigms and levels of intervention. It helped us to better understand what needed to happen:\r\nindeed, it was not so much the technical knowledge that was lacking to start ‘breaking the glasshouse’, but rather the\r\ntransformational process guided by this technical knowledge.\r\nA brainstorming meeting in Thika (Kenya 2012) resulted in the rough contours of a knowledge programme to co-create and\r\nbroker knowledge to catalyse a transformation towards biodiverse, resilient and just food systems. In the three years that\r\nfollowed we co-created the Agricultural Biodiversity Community (ABC) which became the heart of the programme, and was\r\ncatalysed by its annual meetings.\r\nEach in their own way, the community members are all frontrunners on agricultural biodiversity. They are stepping into the\r\nfuture with ideas built on their vast knowledge of local realities of millions of smallholder farmers. Enabling people to move\r\nforward is for us the largest achievement of this programme.\r\nWe now know much more about how change happens. We know that nurturing a process of transformation is a skill in itself\r\nthat merits reflection. This document contributes to such reflection. It is not meant to be an evaluation. Rather, the aim is\r\ntwofold: (1) to learn from the experiences of programme partners; and (2) to make these insights available to others with\r\nan interest in both knowledge for social change and knowledge development around agrobiodiversity.', 'km': 'Different knowledge paradigms and levels of intervention. It helped us to better understand what needed to happen:\r\nindeed, it was not so much the technical knowledge that was lacking to start ‘breaking the glasshouse’, but rather the\r\ntransformational process guided by this technical knowledge.\r\nA brainstorming meeting in Thika (Kenya 2012) resulted in the rough contours of a knowledge programme to co-create and\r\nbroker knowledge to catalyse a transformation towards biodiverse, resilient and just food systems. In the three years that\r\nfollowed we co-created the Agricultural Biodiversity Community (ABC) which became the heart of the programme, and was\r\ncatalysed by its annual meetings.\r\nEach in their own way, the community members are all frontrunners on agricultural biodiversity. They are stepping into the\r\nfuture with ideas built on their vast knowledge of local realities of millions of smallholder farmers. Enabling people to move\r\nforward is for us the largest achievement of this programme.\r\nWe now know much more about how change happens. We know that nurturing a process of transformation is a skill in itself\r\nthat merits reflection. This document contributes to such reflection. It is not meant to be an evaluation. Rather, the aim is\r\ntwofold: (1) to learn from the experiences of programme partners; and (2) to make these insights available to others with\r\nan interest in both knowledge for social change and knowledge development around agrobiodiversity.', 'lo': 'Different knowledge paradigms and levels of intervention. It helped us to better understand what needed to happen:\r\nindeed, it was not so much the technical knowledge that was lacking to start ‘breaking the glasshouse’, but rather the\r\ntransformational process guided by this technical knowledge.\r\nA brainstorming meeting in Thika (Kenya 2012) resulted in the rough contours of a knowledge programme to co-create and\r\nbroker knowledge to catalyse a transformation towards biodiverse, resilient and just food systems. In the three years that\r\nfollowed we co-created the Agricultural Biodiversity Community (ABC) which became the heart of the programme, and was\r\ncatalysed by its annual meetings.\r\nEach in their own way, the community members are all frontrunners on agricultural biodiversity. They are stepping into the\r\nfuture with ideas built on their vast knowledge of local realities of millions of smallholder farmers. Enabling people to move\r\nforward is for us the largest achievement of this programme.\r\nWe now know much more about how change happens. We know that nurturing a process of transformation is a skill in itself\r\nthat merits reflection. This document contributes to such reflection. It is not meant to be an evaluation. Rather, the aim is\r\ntwofold: (1) to learn from the experiences of programme partners; and (2) to make these insights available to others with\r\nan interest in both knowledge for social change and knowledge development around agrobiodiversity.', 'my_MM': 'Different knowledge paradigms and levels of intervention. It helped us to better understand what needed to happen:\r\nindeed, it was not so much the technical knowledge that was lacking to start ‘breaking the glasshouse’, but rather the\r\ntransformational process guided by this technical knowledge.\r\nA brainstorming meeting in Thika (Kenya 2012) resulted in the rough contours of a knowledge programme to co-create and\r\nbroker knowledge to catalyse a transformation towards biodiverse, resilient and just food systems. In the three years that\r\nfollowed we co-created the Agricultural Biodiversity Community (ABC) which became the heart of the programme, and was\r\ncatalysed by its annual meetings.\r\nEach in their own way, the community members are all frontrunners on agricultural biodiversity. They are stepping into the\r\nfuture with ideas built on their vast knowledge of local realities of millions of smallholder farmers. Enabling people to move\r\nforward is for us the largest achievement of this programme.\r\nWe now know much more about how change happens. We know that nurturing a process of transformation is a skill in itself\r\nthat merits reflection. This document contributes to such reflection. It is not meant to be an evaluation. Rather, the aim is\r\ntwofold: (1) to learn from the experiences of programme partners; and (2) to make these insights available to others with\r\nan interest in both knowledge for social change and knowledge development around agrobiodiversity.', 'vi': 'Different knowledge paradigms and levels of intervention. It helped us to better understand what needed to happen:\r\nindeed, it was not so much the technical knowledge that was lacking to start ‘breaking the glasshouse’, but rather the\r\ntransformational process guided by this technical knowledge.\r\nA brainstorming meeting in Thika (Kenya 2012) resulted in the rough contours of a knowledge programme to co-create and\r\nbroker knowledge to catalyse a transformation towards biodiverse, resilient and just food systems. In the three years that\r\nfollowed we co-created the Agricultural Biodiversity Community (ABC) which became the heart of the programme, and was\r\ncatalysed by its annual meetings.\r\nEach in their own way, the community members are all frontrunners on agricultural biodiversity. They are stepping into the\r\nfuture with ideas built on their vast knowledge of local realities of millions of smallholder farmers. Enabling people to move\r\nforward is for us the largest achievement of this programme.\r\nWe now know much more about how change happens. We know that nurturing a process of transformation is a skill in itself\r\nthat merits reflection. This document contributes to such reflection. It is not meant to be an evaluation. Rather, the aim is\r\ntwofold: (1) to learn from the experiences of programme partners; and (2) to make these insights available to others with\r\nan interest in both knowledge for social change and knowledge development around agrobiodiversity.'}
Size1,015.2 KiB
Stateactive
Url typeupload
Name The diversity of knowledge, Reflections on the Agrobiodiversity@knowledged programme
Description

Different knowledge paradigms and levels of intervention. It helped us to better understand what needed to happen: indeed, it was not so much the technical knowledge that was lacking to start ‘breaking the glasshouse’, but rather the transformational process guided by this technical knowledge. A brainstorming meeting in Thika (Kenya 2012) resulted in the rough contours of a knowledge programme to co-create and broker knowledge to catalyse a transformation towards biodiverse, resilient and just food systems. In the three years that followed we co-created the Agricultural Biodiversity Community (ABC) which became the heart of the programme, and was catalysed by its annual meetings. Each in their own way, the community members are all frontrunners on agricultural biodiversity. They are stepping into the future with ideas built on their vast knowledge of local realities of millions of smallholder farmers. Enabling people to move forward is for us the largest achievement of this programme. We now know much more about how change happens. We know that nurturing a process of transformation is a skill in itself that merits reflection. This document contributes to such reflection. It is not meant to be an evaluation. Rather, the aim is twofold: (1) to learn from the experiences of programme partners; and (2) to make these insights available to others with an interest in both knowledge for social change and knowledge development around agrobiodiversity.