Additional Information

Field Value
Data last updated November 12, 2024
Metadata last updated July 14, 2025
Created November 12, 2024
Format PDF
License License not specified
Datastore activeFalse
Datastore contains all records of source fileFalse
Has viewsFalse
Id5ef52a1b-b9df-4f28-ad78-0a183eddcd4b
Mimetypeapplication/pdf
Name translated{'en': 'What place for an agroecological rice technique in rain fed lowland rice systems? - Case study of the SRS in Xieng Khuang Province, Laos.pdf', 'km': 'What place for an agroecological rice technique in rain fed lowland rice systems? - Case study of the SRS in Xieng Khuang Province, Laos', 'lo': 'What place for an agroecological rice technique in rain fed lowland rice systems? - Case study of the SRS in Xieng Khuang Province, Laos', 'my_MM': 'What place for an agroecological rice technique in rain fed lowland rice systems? - Case study of the SRS in Xieng Khuang Province, Laos', 'vi': 'What place for an agroecological rice technique in rain fed lowland rice systems? - Case study of the SRS in Xieng Khuang Province, Laos'}
Package ide16f7ec3-d834-4278-bbd5-9b7b73edd0da
Position0
Resource description{'en': 'With the growing concern about food security in the northern part of Laos, it is critical to address the issue of sustainable\r\nintensification of food production, especially the staple food: rice. In this context, the presented study is designed to evaluate\r\nthe performance and sustainability of a recent agro-ecological rice cropping technique, named the Sustainable Rice System\r\n(SRS). This innovation, introduced in rain-fed lowland systems, is compared to traditional rice growing practices in the\r\nstudy area of Kham District, Xieng Khuang Province. The conduction of the study goes through the understanding of real\r\ndiversity of practices, which has the result of a distinction between one-seedling practices, named as SRS, and the multipleseedling practices. Then, the emphasis on the SRS group demonstrates its status in the area as well as the benefits and\r\ndisadvantages. In order to assess the sustainability of the SRS, the study tries to go beyond only using the “yield” indicator as\r\nthe “be all and end all”, through the three mainstays dimensions of agro ecology; Social, Economic and Environmental. This\r\nshows that, even if the yield is not the primary benefit of the technique, farmers are still interested in adopting it as it\r\nprovides other benefits. Nevertheless, all of the effects are not positive, and the durability of the technique does not seem to\r\nbe fully guaranteed. This study therefore introduces many key answers to the questions addressed and presents a first\r\noverview to pave the way for following studies.', 'km': 'With the growing concern about food security in the northern part of Laos, it is critical to address the issue of sustainable\r\nintensification of food production, especially the staple food: rice. In this context, the presented study is designed to evaluate\r\nthe performance and sustainability of a recent agro-ecological rice cropping technique, named the Sustainable Rice System\r\n(SRS). This innovation, introduced in rain-fed lowland systems, is compared to traditional rice growing practices in the\r\nstudy area of Kham District, Xieng Khuang Province. The conduction of the study goes through the understanding of real\r\ndiversity of practices, which has the result of a distinction between one-seedling practices, named as SRS, and the multipleseedling practices. Then, the emphasis on the SRS group demonstrates its status in the area as well as the benefits and\r\ndisadvantages. In order to assess the sustainability of the SRS, the study tries to go beyond only using the “yield” indicator as\r\nthe “be all and end all”, through the three mainstays dimensions of agro ecology; Social, Economic and Environmental. This\r\nshows that, even if the yield is not the primary benefit of the technique, farmers are still interested in adopting it as it\r\nprovides other benefits. Nevertheless, all of the effects are not positive, and the durability of the technique does not seem to\r\nbe fully guaranteed. This study therefore introduces many key answers to the questions addressed and presents a first\r\noverview to pave the way for following studies.', 'lo': 'With the growing concern about food security in the northern part of Laos, it is critical to address the issue of sustainable\r\nintensification of food production, especially the staple food: rice. In this context, the presented study is designed to evaluate\r\nthe performance and sustainability of a recent agro-ecological rice cropping technique, named the Sustainable Rice System\r\n(SRS). This innovation, introduced in rain-fed lowland systems, is compared to traditional rice growing practices in the\r\nstudy area of Kham District, Xieng Khuang Province. The conduction of the study goes through the understanding of real\r\ndiversity of practices, which has the result of a distinction between one-seedling practices, named as SRS, and the multipleseedling practices. Then, the emphasis on the SRS group demonstrates its status in the area as well as the benefits and\r\ndisadvantages. In order to assess the sustainability of the SRS, the study tries to go beyond only using the “yield” indicator as\r\nthe “be all and end all”, through the three mainstays dimensions of agro ecology; Social, Economic and Environmental. This\r\nshows that, even if the yield is not the primary benefit of the technique, farmers are still interested in adopting it as it\r\nprovides other benefits. Nevertheless, all of the effects are not positive, and the durability of the technique does not seem to\r\nbe fully guaranteed. This study therefore introduces many key answers to the questions addressed and presents a first\r\noverview to pave the way for following studies.', 'my_MM': 'With the growing concern about food security in the northern part of Laos, it is critical to address the issue of sustainable\r\nintensification of food production, especially the staple food: rice. In this context, the presented study is designed to evaluate\r\nthe performance and sustainability of a recent agro-ecological rice cropping technique, named the Sustainable Rice System\r\n(SRS). This innovation, introduced in rain-fed lowland systems, is compared to traditional rice growing practices in the\r\nstudy area of Kham District, Xieng Khuang Province. The conduction of the study goes through the understanding of real\r\ndiversity of practices, which has the result of a distinction between one-seedling practices, named as SRS, and the multipleseedling practices. Then, the emphasis on the SRS group demonstrates its status in the area as well as the benefits and\r\ndisadvantages. In order to assess the sustainability of the SRS, the study tries to go beyond only using the “yield” indicator as\r\nthe “be all and end all”, through the three mainstays dimensions of agro ecology; Social, Economic and Environmental. This\r\nshows that, even if the yield is not the primary benefit of the technique, farmers are still interested in adopting it as it\r\nprovides other benefits. Nevertheless, all of the effects are not positive, and the durability of the technique does not seem to\r\nbe fully guaranteed. This study therefore introduces many key answers to the questions addressed and presents a first\r\noverview to pave the way for following studies.', 'vi': 'With the growing concern about food security in the northern part of Laos, it is critical to address the issue of sustainable\r\nintensification of food production, especially the staple food: rice. In this context, the presented study is designed to evaluate\r\nthe performance and sustainability of a recent agro-ecological rice cropping technique, named the Sustainable Rice System\r\n(SRS). This innovation, introduced in rain-fed lowland systems, is compared to traditional rice growing practices in the\r\nstudy area of Kham District, Xieng Khuang Province. The conduction of the study goes through the understanding of real\r\ndiversity of practices, which has the result of a distinction between one-seedling practices, named as SRS, and the multipleseedling practices. Then, the emphasis on the SRS group demonstrates its status in the area as well as the benefits and\r\ndisadvantages. In order to assess the sustainability of the SRS, the study tries to go beyond only using the “yield” indicator as\r\nthe “be all and end all”, through the three mainstays dimensions of agro ecology; Social, Economic and Environmental. This\r\nshows that, even if the yield is not the primary benefit of the technique, farmers are still interested in adopting it as it\r\nprovides other benefits. Nevertheless, all of the effects are not positive, and the durability of the technique does not seem to\r\nbe fully guaranteed. This study therefore introduces many key answers to the questions addressed and presents a first\r\noverview to pave the way for following studies.'}
Size5 MiB
Stateactive
Url typeupload
Name What place for an agroecological rice technique in rain fed lowland rice systems? - Case study of the SRS in Xieng Khuang Province, Laos.pdf
Description

With the growing concern about food security in the northern part of Laos, it is critical to address the issue of sustainable intensification of food production, especially the staple food: rice. In this context, the presented study is designed to evaluate the performance and sustainability of a recent agro-ecological rice cropping technique, named the Sustainable Rice System (SRS). This innovation, introduced in rain-fed lowland systems, is compared to traditional rice growing practices in the study area of Kham District, Xieng Khuang Province. The conduction of the study goes through the understanding of real diversity of practices, which has the result of a distinction between one-seedling practices, named as SRS, and the multipleseedling practices. Then, the emphasis on the SRS group demonstrates its status in the area as well as the benefits and disadvantages. In order to assess the sustainability of the SRS, the study tries to go beyond only using the “yield” indicator as the “be all and end all”, through the three mainstays dimensions of agro ecology; Social, Economic and Environmental. This shows that, even if the yield is not the primary benefit of the technique, farmers are still interested in adopting it as it provides other benefits. Nevertheless, all of the effects are not positive, and the durability of the technique does not seem to be fully guaranteed. This study therefore introduces many key answers to the questions addressed and presents a first overview to pave the way for following studies.