Who Will Feed Us? The Industrial Food Chain vs. The Peasant Food Web

1 - Peasants are the main or sole food providers to more than 70% of the world’s people, and peasants produce this food with less (often much less) than 25% of the resources – including land, water, fossil fuels – used to get all of the world’s food to the table.

2 - The Industrial Food Chain uses at least 75% of the world’s agricultural resources and is a major source of GHG emissions, but provides food to less than 30% of the world’s people.

3 - For every $1 consumers pay to Chain retailers, society pays another $2 for the Chain’s health and environmental damages. The total bill for the Chain’s direct and indirect cost is 5 times governments’ annual military expenditure.

4 - The Chain lacks the agility to respond to climate change. Its R&D is not only distorted but also declining as it concentrates the global food market.

5 - The Peasant Food Web nurtures 9-100 times the biodiversity used by the Chain, across plants, livestock, fish and forests. Peasants have the knowledge, innovative energy and networks needed to respond to climate change; they have the operational scope and scale; and they are closest to the hungry and malnourished.

6 - There is still much about our food systems that we don’t know we don’t know. Sometimes, the Chain knows but isn’t telling. Other times, policymakers aren’t looking. Most often, we fail to consider the diverse knowledge systems in the Peasant Food Web.

7 - The bottom line: at least 3.9 billion people are either hungry or malnourished because the Industrial Food Chain is too distorted, vastly too expensive, and – after 70 years of trying – just can’t scale up to feed the world.

ຂໍ້ເມູນ ແລະ ແຫຼ່ງທີ່ມາ

ຂໍ້ມູນເພີ່ມເຕີມ

ຊ່ອງຂໍ້ມູນ ມູນຄ່າ
ປະເພດຜະລິດຕະພັນຂອງອາລິເຊຍ ບໍ່ມີ
ຊື່ເລື່ອງ Who Will Feed Us? The Industrial Food Chain vs. The Peasant Food Web
ຄຳອະທິບາ 1 - Peasants are the main or sole food providers to more than 70% of the world’s people, and peasants produce this food with less (often much less) than 25% of the resources – including land, water, fossil fuels – used to get all of the world’s food to the table. 2 - The Industrial Food Chain uses at least 75% of the world’s agricultural resources and is a major source of GHG emissions, but provides food to less than 30% of the world’s people. 3 - For every $1 consumers pay to Chain retailers, society pays another $2 for the Chain’s health and environmental damages. The total bill for the Chain’s direct and indirect cost is 5 times governments’ annual military expenditure. 4 - The Chain lacks the agility to respond to climate change. Its R&D is not only distorted but also declining as it concentrates the global food market. 5 - The Peasant Food Web nurtures 9-100 times the biodiversity used by the Chain, across plants, livestock, fish and forests. Peasants have the knowledge, innovative energy and networks needed to respond to climate change; they have the operational scope and scale; and they are closest to the hungry and malnourished. 6 - There is still much about our food systems that we don’t know we don’t know. Sometimes, the Chain knows but isn’t telling. Other times, policymakers aren’t looking. Most often, we fail to consider the diverse knowledge systems in the Peasant Food Web. 7 - The bottom line: at least 3.9 billion people are either hungry or malnourished because the Industrial Food Chain is too distorted, vastly too expensive, and – after 70 years of trying – just can’t scale up to feed the world.
ໝວດໝູ່ນິເວດກະສິກຳ
  • ລະບົບປະສົມປະສານ
  • ຫຼຸດຜ່ອນປັດໄຈການຜະລິດ ແລະ ນຳກັບມາໃຊ້ໃໝ່
  • ສຸຂະພາບດິນ
  • ເສດຖະກິດ ແລະ ລາຍຮັບ
  • ສຸຂະພາບ ແລະ ໂພສະນາການ
  • ລະບົບອາຫານທີ່ຍືນຍົງ
  • ຊີວະນາໆພັນ
  • ສະພາບອາກາດ
  • ການຄຸ້ມຄອງຊັບພະຍາກອນທຳມະຊາດ
  • ທຶນ
ຄໍາສໍາຄັນດ້ານນິເວດວິທະຍາ
  • ກະສິກຳອິນຊີ
  • ກະສິກຳແບບຍືນຍົງ
  • ຈຸລິນຊີດື້ຢາ
  • ຊີວະມວນ
  • ພືດໝູນວຽນ
  • ການອະນຸລັກດິນ
  • ລາຍຮັບ
  • ຄວາມປອດໄພຂອງອາຫານ
  • ສານອາຫານ
  • ຄວາມໝັ້ນຄົງດ້ານສະບຽງອາຫານ
  • ການແປຮູບອາຫານ
  • ກະສິກຳໃນຕົວເມືອງ
  • ຊີວະນາໆພັນ
  • ທີ່ຢູ່ອາໄສ
  • ການປ່ຽນແປງຂອງສະພາບອາກາດ
  • ຄວາມເບາະບາງ
  • None
  • ທຶນ
ອົງການຈັດຕັ້ງປະກອບສ່ວນ ETC Group
ຜູ້ຂຽນ ETC Group
ປີ 2017
ປະເພດຂອງເອກະສານ ບົດຄວາມການຄົ້ນຄວ້າ
ພາສາ ພາສາອັງກິດ
ຂໍ້ມູນພື້ນທີ່
ປະເທດ Global
ລະດັບບໍລິຫານ 1
ລະດັບບໍລິຫານ 2
Web Link