ກະແສການເຄື່ອນໄຫວ

• ALiSEA Intern ອັບເດດ ຊຸດຂໍ້ມູນ Farmer Field School Guidance DocumentPlanning for quality programmes
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ສ້າງອົງກອນ TDU
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ອັບເດດອົງກອນ TABLE
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ສ້າງອົງກອນ TABLE
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ອັບເດດ ຊຸດຂໍ້ມູນ Transformative approaches to agroecology at the landscape level
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ອັບເດດ ຊຸດຂໍ້ມູນ Transformative approaches to agroecology at the landscape level
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ອັບເດດ ຊຸດຂໍ້ມູນ Transformative approaches to agroecology at the landscape level
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ອັບເດດອົງກອນ Natural Agricultural Village Shop
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ອັບເດດ ຊຸດຂໍ້ມູນ Role of market in promoting agroecology, A case study on vegetable supply Sa Ang district, Kandal province of Cambodia
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ອັບເດດ ຊຸດຂໍ້ມູນ Role of market in promoting agroecology, A case study on vegetable supply Sa Ang district, Kandal province of Cambodia
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ອັບເດດ ຊຸດຂໍ້ມູນ Role of market in promoting agroecology, A case study on vegetable supply Sa Ang distric, Kandal province of Cambodia
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ອັບເດດ ຊຸດຂໍ້ມູນ Role of market in promoting agroecology, A case study on vegetable supply Sa Ang distric, Kandal province of Cambodia
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ສ້າງອົງກອນ Natural Agricultural Village
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ອັບເດດ ຊຸດຂໍ້ມູນ  Role of market in promoting agroecology A case study on vegetable supply Sa Ang distric, Kandal province of Cambodia
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ອັບເດດ ຊຸດຂໍ້ມູນ The Current and Future Roles of Small Farm Resource Centers in Extension and Advisory Services
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ອັບເດດ ຊຸດຂໍ້ມູນ The Current and Future Roles of Small Farm Resources Centre in Extension and Advisory Services
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ອັບເດດ ຊຸດຂໍ້ມູນ The Current and Future Roles of Small Farm Resources Centre in Extension and Advisory Services
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ອັບເດດ ຊຸດຂໍ້ມູນ The Farming Systems Trial
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ສ້າງອົງກອນ Rodale Institute
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ອັບເດດ ຊຸດຂໍ້ມູນ The Farming Systems Trial
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ອັບເດດ ຊຸດຂໍ້ມູນ Toward thick legitimacy: Creating a web of legitimacy for agroecology
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ອັບເດດ ຊຸດຂໍ້ມູນ Legitimacy is at the heart of knowledge politics surrounding agriculture and food. When people accept industrial food practices as credible and authoritative, they are consenting to their use and existence. With their thick legitimacy, industrial food systems paralyze the growth of alternative agricultures, including agroecology. Questions of how alternative agricultures can attain their own thick legitimacy in order to compete with, and displace, that of industrial food have not yet attracted much scrutiny. We show that both agroecological and scientific legitimacy grow out of a web of legitimation processes in the scientific, policy, political, legal, practice, and civic arenas. Crucially, legitimation often comes through meeting what we call ‘credibility tests’. Agroecologists can learn to navigate these co-constituted, multiple bases of legitimacy by paying attention to how credibility tests are currently being set in each arena, and beginning to recalibrate these tests to open more room for agroecology. Using a schematic of three non-exclusive pathways, we explore some possible practical interventions that agroecologists and other advocates of alternative agricultures could take. These pathways include: leveraging, while also reshaping, the existing standards and practices of science; extending influence into policy, legal, practical, and civic arenas; and centering attention on the ethical legitimacy of food systems. We conclude that agroecologists can benefit from considering how to build legitimacy for their work.
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ອັບເດດ ຊຸດຂໍ້ມູນ Legitimacy is at the heart of knowledge politics surrounding agriculture and food. When people accept industrial food practices as credible and authoritative, they are consenting to their use and existence. With their thick legitimacy, industrial food systems paralyze the growth of alternative agricultures, including agroecology. Questions of how alternative agricultures can attain their own thick legitimacy in order to compete with, and displace, that of industrial food have not yet attracted much scrutiny. We show that both agroecological and scientific legitimacy grow out of a web of legitimation processes in the scientific, policy, political, legal, practice, and civic arenas. Crucially, legitimation often comes through meeting what we call ‘credibility tests’. Agroecologists can learn to navigate these co-constituted, multiple bases of legitimacy by paying attention to how credibility tests are currently being set in each arena, and beginning to recalibrate these tests to open more room for agroecology. Using a schematic of three non-exclusive pathways, we explore some possible practical interventions that agroecologists and other advocates of alternative agricultures could take. These pathways include: leveraging, while also reshaping, the existing standards and practices of science; extending influence into policy, legal, practical, and civic arenas; and centering attention on the ethical legitimacy of food systems. We conclude that agroecologists can benefit from considering how to build legitimacy for their work.
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ອັບເດດ ຊຸດຂໍ້ມູນ Legitimacy is at the heart of knowledge politics surrounding agriculture and food. When people accept industrial food practices as credible and authoritative, they are consenting to their use and existence. With their thick legitimacy, industrial food systems paralyze the growth of alternative agricultures, including agroecology. Questions of how alternative agricultures can attain their own thick legitimacy in order to compete with, and displace, that of industrial food have not yet attracted much scrutiny. We show that both agroecological and scientific legitimacy grow out of a web of legitimation processes in the scientific, policy, political, legal, practice, and civic arenas. Crucially, legitimation often comes through meeting what we call ‘credibility tests’. Agroecologists can learn to navigate these co-constituted, multiple bases of legitimacy by paying attention to how credibility tests are currently being set in each arena, and beginning to recalibrate these tests to open more room for agroecology. Using a schematic of three non-exclusive pathways, we explore some possible practical interventions that agroecologists and other advocates of alternative agricultures could take. These pathways include: leveraging, while also reshaping, the existing standards and practices of science; extending influence into policy, legal, practical, and civic arenas; and centering attention on the ethical legitimacy of food systems. We conclude that agroecologists can benefit from considering how to build legitimacy for their work.
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ອັບເດດ ຊຸດຂໍ້ມູນ Toward thick legitimacycreating a web of legitimacy for agroecology
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ອັບເດດ ຊຸດຂໍ້ມູນ Sustainable commercialization of new crops for the agricultural bioeconomy
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ອັບເດດອົງກອນ Elementa
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ສ້າງອົງກອນ Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ອັບເດດ ຊຸດຂໍ້ມູນ Sustainable commercialization of new crop for the agricultural bieconomy
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ອັບເດດ ຊຸດຂໍ້ມູນ Lending credence: motivation, trust, and organic certification
  1 ປີກ່ອນ
• ALiSEA Intern ສ້າງອົງກອນ SIDEA
  1 ປີກ່ອນ