Strengthening multi-stakeholder agroecology platforms in Vietnam: A landscape analysis - Strengthening multi-stakeholder agroecology platforms in Vietnam: a landscape analysis - ALiSEA

Thông tin khác

Miền	Giá trị
Data last updated	20 tháng 10, 2025
Metadata last updated	20 tháng 10, 2025
Được tạo ra	20 tháng 10, 2025
Định dạng	PDF
Giấy phép	License Not Specified
Datastore active	False
Datastore contains all records of source file	False
Has views	True
Id	6bb1a93b-484c-4d41-85c8-0ef53b11ee9f
Mimetype	application/pdf
Name translated	{'en': 'Strengthening multi-stakeholder agroecology platforms in Vietnam: a landscape analysis', 'km': 'Strengthening multi-stakeholder agroecology platforms in Vietnam: a landscape analysis', 'lo': 'Strengthening multi-stakeholder agroecology platforms in Vietnam: a landscape analysis', 'my_MM': 'Strengthening multi-stakeholder agroecology platforms in Vietnam: a landscape analysis', 'vi': 'Strengthening multi-stakeholder agroecology platforms in Vietnam: a landscape analysis'}
Package id	05bcb833-a98c-45d9-a324-64e32865baee
Position	0
Resource description	{'en': 'Using multi-stakeholder platforms offers a promising approach for sharing agricultural innovation,\r\nreducing transaction costs, and catalyzing development through stimulating stakeholder\r\nengagement in the innovation process to accelerate food systems transformation. Agriculturerelated multi-stakeholder platforms (AMSPs) are major players to intervention strategies of\r\nagricultural development programs. However, AMSPs face multiple challenges that limit and\r\nnegatively impact their functions. This study aims to map the AMSP landscape, examine their\r\noperational activities, and provide recommendations for strengthening private- and public-sector\r\nengagement to support long-term agricultural sustainability in Vietnam.\r\nThe study used a three-step qualitative research approach to identify AMSPs and subsequently\r\ncollected secondary and primary data. Results reveal three types of AMSPs classified from 35\r\nidentified platforms: (i) development organization-led, (ii) civil society organization (CSO)-led, and\r\n(iii) government organization-led platforms. Their main characteristics were then investigated\r\naccording to the four basic dimensions of organizational theory: structural, contextual, operational,\r\nand relational aspects. Next, the study analyzed the influence of each AMSP type on agricultural\r\npolicies and practices, including those integrating agroecological approaches. The study then\r\nexamined each AMSP’s achievements and challenges related to AMSP impact and sustainability,\r\ntogether with the constraints related to private- and public-sector engagement, and incentives\r\nand investment in agroecological transition.\r\nThis landscape analysis has identified various mechanisms and possibilities for the Agroecological\r\nTRANSITIONS Program — and other related sustainable approach projects — to engage with these\r\nAMSPs. This collaboration will stimulate a process for the co-design and co-creation of innovative\r\nincentive mechanisms to leverage investment, support the use of holistic traceability tools, and\r\nscale-out agroecological practices in rice value chains in Vietnam.', 'km': 'Using multi-stakeholder platforms offers a promising approach for sharing agricultural innovation,\r\nreducing transaction costs, and catalyzing development through stimulating stakeholder\r\nengagement in the innovation process to accelerate food systems transformation. Agriculturerelated multi-stakeholder platforms (AMSPs) are major players to intervention strategies of\r\nagricultural development programs. However, AMSPs face multiple challenges that limit and\r\nnegatively impact their functions. This study aims to map the AMSP landscape, examine their\r\noperational activities, and provide recommendations for strengthening private- and public-sector\r\nengagement to support long-term agricultural sustainability in Vietnam.\r\nThe study used a three-step qualitative research approach to identify AMSPs and subsequently\r\ncollected secondary and primary data. Results reveal three types of AMSPs classified from 35\r\nidentified platforms: (i) development organization-led, (ii) civil society organization (CSO)-led, and\r\n(iii) government organization-led platforms. Their main characteristics were then investigated\r\naccording to the four basic dimensions of organizational theory: structural, contextual, operational,\r\nand relational aspects. Next, the study analyzed the influence of each AMSP type on agricultural\r\npolicies and practices, including those integrating agroecological approaches. The study then\r\nexamined each AMSP’s achievements and challenges related to AMSP impact and sustainability,\r\ntogether with the constraints related to private- and public-sector engagement, and incentives\r\nand investment in agroecological transition.\r\nThis landscape analysis has identified various mechanisms and possibilities for the Agroecological\r\nTRANSITIONS Program — and other related sustainable approach projects — to engage with these\r\nAMSPs. This collaboration will stimulate a process for the co-design and co-creation of innovative\r\nincentive mechanisms to leverage investment, support the use of holistic traceability tools, and\r\nscale-out agroecological practices in rice value chains in Vietnam.', 'lo': 'Using multi-stakeholder platforms offers a promising approach for sharing agricultural innovation,\r\nreducing transaction costs, and catalyzing development through stimulating stakeholder\r\nengagement in the innovation process to accelerate food systems transformation. Agriculturerelated multi-stakeholder platforms (AMSPs) are major players to intervention strategies of\r\nagricultural development programs. However, AMSPs face multiple challenges that limit and\r\nnegatively impact their functions. This study aims to map the AMSP landscape, examine their\r\noperational activities, and provide recommendations for strengthening private- and public-sector\r\nengagement to support long-term agricultural sustainability in Vietnam.\r\nThe study used a three-step qualitative research approach to identify AMSPs and subsequently\r\ncollected secondary and primary data. Results reveal three types of AMSPs classified from 35\r\nidentified platforms: (i) development organization-led, (ii) civil society organization (CSO)-led, and\r\n(iii) government organization-led platforms. Their main characteristics were then investigated\r\naccording to the four basic dimensions of organizational theory: structural, contextual, operational,\r\nand relational aspects. Next, the study analyzed the influence of each AMSP type on agricultural\r\npolicies and practices, including those integrating agroecological approaches. The study then\r\nexamined each AMSP’s achievements and challenges related to AMSP impact and sustainability,\r\ntogether with the constraints related to private- and public-sector engagement, and incentives\r\nand investment in agroecological transition.\r\nThis landscape analysis has identified various mechanisms and possibilities for the Agroecological\r\nTRANSITIONS Program — and other related sustainable approach projects — to engage with these\r\nAMSPs. This collaboration will stimulate a process for the co-design and co-creation of innovative\r\nincentive mechanisms to leverage investment, support the use of holistic traceability tools, and\r\nscale-out agroecological practices in rice value chains in Vietnam.', 'my_MM': 'Using multi-stakeholder platforms offers a promising approach for sharing agricultural innovation,\r\nreducing transaction costs, and catalyzing development through stimulating stakeholder\r\nengagement in the innovation process to accelerate food systems transformation. Agriculturerelated multi-stakeholder platforms (AMSPs) are major players to intervention strategies of\r\nagricultural development programs. However, AMSPs face multiple challenges that limit and\r\nnegatively impact their functions. This study aims to map the AMSP landscape, examine their\r\noperational activities, and provide recommendations for strengthening private- and public-sector\r\nengagement to support long-term agricultural sustainability in Vietnam.\r\nThe study used a three-step qualitative research approach to identify AMSPs and subsequently\r\ncollected secondary and primary data. Results reveal three types of AMSPs classified from 35\r\nidentified platforms: (i) development organization-led, (ii) civil society organization (CSO)-led, and\r\n(iii) government organization-led platforms. Their main characteristics were then investigated\r\naccording to the four basic dimensions of organizational theory: structural, contextual, operational,\r\nand relational aspects. Next, the study analyzed the influence of each AMSP type on agricultural\r\npolicies and practices, including those integrating agroecological approaches. The study then\r\nexamined each AMSP’s achievements and challenges related to AMSP impact and sustainability,\r\ntogether with the constraints related to private- and public-sector engagement, and incentives\r\nand investment in agroecological transition.\r\nThis landscape analysis has identified various mechanisms and possibilities for the Agroecological\r\nTRANSITIONS Program — and other related sustainable approach projects — to engage with these\r\nAMSPs. This collaboration will stimulate a process for the co-design and co-creation of innovative\r\nincentive mechanisms to leverage investment, support the use of holistic traceability tools, and\r\nscale-out agroecological practices in rice value chains in Vietnam.', 'vi': 'Using multi-stakeholder platforms offers a promising approach for sharing agricultural innovation,\r\nreducing transaction costs, and catalyzing development through stimulating stakeholder\r\nengagement in the innovation process to accelerate food systems transformation. Agriculturerelated multi-stakeholder platforms (AMSPs) are major players to intervention strategies of\r\nagricultural development programs. However, AMSPs face multiple challenges that limit and\r\nnegatively impact their functions. This study aims to map the AMSP landscape, examine their\r\noperational activities, and provide recommendations for strengthening private- and public-sector\r\nengagement to support long-term agricultural sustainability in Vietnam.\r\nThe study used a three-step qualitative research approach to identify AMSPs and subsequently\r\ncollected secondary and primary data. Results reveal three types of AMSPs classified from 35\r\nidentified platforms: (i) development organization-led, (ii) civil society organization (CSO)-led, and\r\n(iii) government organization-led platforms. Their main characteristics were then investigated\r\naccording to the four basic dimensions of organizational theory: structural, contextual, operational,\r\nand relational aspects. Next, the study analyzed the influence of each AMSP type on agricultural\r\npolicies and practices, including those integrating agroecological approaches. The study then\r\nexamined each AMSP’s achievements and challenges related to AMSP impact and sustainability,\r\ntogether with the constraints related to private- and public-sector engagement, and incentives\r\nand investment in agroecological transition.\r\nThis landscape analysis has identified various mechanisms and possibilities for the Agroecological\r\nTRANSITIONS Program — and other related sustainable approach projects — to engage with these\r\nAMSPs. This collaboration will stimulate a process for the co-design and co-creation of innovative\r\nincentive mechanisms to leverage investment, support the use of holistic traceability tools, and\r\nscale-out agroecological practices in rice value chains in Vietnam.'}
Size	10,6 MiB
State	active
Url type	upload
Tên	Strengthening multi-stakeholder agroecology platforms in Vietnam: a landscape analysis
Sự miêu tả	Using multi-stakeholder platforms offers a promising approach for sharing agricultural innovation, reducing transaction costs, and catalyzing development through stimulating stakeholder engagement in the innovation process to accelerate food systems transformation. Agriculturerelated multi-stakeholder platforms (AMSPs) are major players to intervention strategies of agricultural development programs. However, AMSPs face multiple challenges that limit and negatively impact their functions. This study aims to map the AMSP landscape, examine their operational activities, and provide recommendations for strengthening private- and public-sector engagement to support long-term agricultural sustainability in Vietnam. The study used a three-step qualitative research approach to identify AMSPs and subsequently collected secondary and primary data. Results reveal three types of AMSPs classified from 35 identified platforms: (i) development organization-led, (ii) civil society organization (CSO)-led, and (iii) government organization-led platforms. Their main characteristics were then investigated according to the four basic dimensions of organizational theory: structural, contextual, operational, and relational aspects. Next, the study analyzed the influence of each AMSP type on agricultural policies and practices, including those integrating agroecological approaches. The study then examined each AMSP’s achievements and challenges related to AMSP impact and sustainability, together with the constraints related to private- and public-sector engagement, and incentives and investment in agroecological transition. This landscape analysis has identified various mechanisms and possibilities for the Agroecological TRANSITIONS Program — and other related sustainable approach projects — to engage with these AMSPs. This collaboration will stimulate a process for the co-design and co-creation of innovative incentive mechanisms to leverage investment, support the use of holistic traceability tools, and scale-out agroecological practices in rice value chains in Vietnam.