Chuỗi hoạt động

• ALiSEA Intern updated the Bộ dữ liệu Farmer Field School Guidance DocumentPlanning for quality programmes
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern đã tạo tổ chức TDU
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern Tổ chức đã được cập nhật TABLE
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern đã tạo tổ chức TABLE
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern updated the Bộ dữ liệu Transformative approaches to agroecology at the landscape level
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern updated the Bộ dữ liệu Transformative approaches to agroecology at the landscape level
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern updated the Bộ dữ liệu Transformative approaches to agroecology at the landscape level
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern Tổ chức đã được cập nhật Natural Agricultural Village Shop
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern updated the Bộ dữ liệu Role of market in promoting agroecology, A case study on vegetable supply Sa Ang district, Kandal province of Cambodia
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern updated the Bộ dữ liệu Role of market in promoting agroecology, A case study on vegetable supply Sa Ang district, Kandal province of Cambodia
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern updated the Bộ dữ liệu Role of market in promoting agroecology, A case study on vegetable supply Sa Ang distric, Kandal province of Cambodia
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern updated the Bộ dữ liệu Role of market in promoting agroecology, A case study on vegetable supply Sa Ang distric, Kandal province of Cambodia
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern đã tạo tổ chức Natural Agricultural Village
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern updated the Bộ dữ liệu  Role of market in promoting agroecology A case study on vegetable supply Sa Ang distric, Kandal province of Cambodia
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern updated the Bộ dữ liệu The Current and Future Roles of Small Farm Resource Centers in Extension and Advisory Services
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern updated the Bộ dữ liệu The Current and Future Roles of Small Farm Resources Centre in Extension and Advisory Services
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern updated the Bộ dữ liệu The Current and Future Roles of Small Farm Resources Centre in Extension and Advisory Services
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern updated the Bộ dữ liệu The Farming Systems Trial
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern đã tạo tổ chức Rodale Institute
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern updated the Bộ dữ liệu The Farming Systems Trial
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern updated the Bộ dữ liệu Toward thick legitimacy: Creating a web of legitimacy for agroecology
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern updated the Bộ dữ liệu Legitimacy is at the heart of knowledge politics surrounding agriculture and food. When people accept industrial food practices as credible and authoritative, they are consenting to their use and existence. With their thick legitimacy, industrial food systems paralyze the growth of alternative agricultures, including agroecology. Questions of how alternative agricultures can attain their own thick legitimacy in order to compete with, and displace, that of industrial food have not yet attracted much scrutiny. We show that both agroecological and scientific legitimacy grow out of a web of legitimation processes in the scientific, policy, political, legal, practice, and civic arenas. Crucially, legitimation often comes through meeting what we call ‘credibility tests’. Agroecologists can learn to navigate these co-constituted, multiple bases of legitimacy by paying attention to how credibility tests are currently being set in each arena, and beginning to recalibrate these tests to open more room for agroecology. Using a schematic of three non-exclusive pathways, we explore some possible practical interventions that agroecologists and other advocates of alternative agricultures could take. These pathways include: leveraging, while also reshaping, the existing standards and practices of science; extending influence into policy, legal, practical, and civic arenas; and centering attention on the ethical legitimacy of food systems. We conclude that agroecologists can benefit from considering how to build legitimacy for their work.
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern updated the Bộ dữ liệu Legitimacy is at the heart of knowledge politics surrounding agriculture and food. When people accept industrial food practices as credible and authoritative, they are consenting to their use and existence. With their thick legitimacy, industrial food systems paralyze the growth of alternative agricultures, including agroecology. Questions of how alternative agricultures can attain their own thick legitimacy in order to compete with, and displace, that of industrial food have not yet attracted much scrutiny. We show that both agroecological and scientific legitimacy grow out of a web of legitimation processes in the scientific, policy, political, legal, practice, and civic arenas. Crucially, legitimation often comes through meeting what we call ‘credibility tests’. Agroecologists can learn to navigate these co-constituted, multiple bases of legitimacy by paying attention to how credibility tests are currently being set in each arena, and beginning to recalibrate these tests to open more room for agroecology. Using a schematic of three non-exclusive pathways, we explore some possible practical interventions that agroecologists and other advocates of alternative agricultures could take. These pathways include: leveraging, while also reshaping, the existing standards and practices of science; extending influence into policy, legal, practical, and civic arenas; and centering attention on the ethical legitimacy of food systems. We conclude that agroecologists can benefit from considering how to build legitimacy for their work.
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern updated the Bộ dữ liệu Legitimacy is at the heart of knowledge politics surrounding agriculture and food. When people accept industrial food practices as credible and authoritative, they are consenting to their use and existence. With their thick legitimacy, industrial food systems paralyze the growth of alternative agricultures, including agroecology. Questions of how alternative agricultures can attain their own thick legitimacy in order to compete with, and displace, that of industrial food have not yet attracted much scrutiny. We show that both agroecological and scientific legitimacy grow out of a web of legitimation processes in the scientific, policy, political, legal, practice, and civic arenas. Crucially, legitimation often comes through meeting what we call ‘credibility tests’. Agroecologists can learn to navigate these co-constituted, multiple bases of legitimacy by paying attention to how credibility tests are currently being set in each arena, and beginning to recalibrate these tests to open more room for agroecology. Using a schematic of three non-exclusive pathways, we explore some possible practical interventions that agroecologists and other advocates of alternative agricultures could take. These pathways include: leveraging, while also reshaping, the existing standards and practices of science; extending influence into policy, legal, practical, and civic arenas; and centering attention on the ethical legitimacy of food systems. We conclude that agroecologists can benefit from considering how to build legitimacy for their work.
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern updated the Bộ dữ liệu Toward thick legitimacycreating a web of legitimacy for agroecology
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern updated the Bộ dữ liệu Sustainable commercialization of new crops for the agricultural bioeconomy
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern Tổ chức đã được cập nhật Elementa
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern đã tạo tổ chức Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern updated the Bộ dữ liệu Sustainable commercialization of new crop for the agricultural bieconomy
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern updated the Bộ dữ liệu Lending credence: motivation, trust, and organic certification
  1 năm trước
• ALiSEA Intern đã tạo tổ chức SIDEA
  1 năm trước