Integrating Agroecology and Participatory Action Research (PAR). Lessons from Central America

This article aims to: (1) analyze the key characteristics and principles of two case studies that integrated PAR and agroecology in Central America; and (2) learn from the lessons offered by these case studies, as well as others from the literature,onhowtobetterintegratePARandagroecology.KeyprinciplesidentifiedforeffectivePAR agroecological processes include a shared interest in research by partners, a belief in collective power/action, a commitment to participation, practicing humility and establishing trust and accountability. Important lessons to consider for future work include: (1) research processes that did not start as PAR, can evolve into it; (2) farmer/stakeholder participation in setting the research agenda, from the outset, results in higher engagement and enhanced outcomes; (3) having the right partners for the desired outcomes is key; (4) intentional and explicit reflection is an essential component of PAR processes; and (5) cross-generational collaborations are crucial to long-term benefits. Key challenges that confront PAR processes include the need for time and resources over longer periods; the complexity of multi-actor process facilitation; and institutional barriers within the academy and development organizations, which prevent shifting investment towards integrated PAR agroecological processes.

ຂໍ້ເມູນ ແລະ ແຫຼ່ງທີ່ມາ

ຂໍ້ມູນເພີ່ມເຕີມ

ຊ່ອງຂໍ້ມູນ ມູນຄ່າ
ປະເພດຜະລິດຕະພັນຂອງອາລິເຊຍ ບໍ່ມີ
ຊື່ເລື່ອງ Integrating Agroecology and Participatory Action Research (PAR). Lessons from Central America
ຄຳອະທິບາ This article aims to: (1) analyze the key characteristics and principles of two case studies that integrated PAR and agroecology in Central America; and (2) learn from the lessons offered by these case studies, as well as others from the literature,onhowtobetterintegratePARandagroecology.KeyprinciplesidentifiedforeffectivePAR agroecological processes include a shared interest in research by partners, a belief in collective power/action, a commitment to participation, practicing humility and establishing trust and accountability. Important lessons to consider for future work include: (1) research processes that did not start as PAR, can evolve into it; (2) farmer/stakeholder participation in setting the research agenda, from the outset, results in higher engagement and enhanced outcomes; (3) having the right partners for the desired outcomes is key; (4) intentional and explicit reflection is an essential component of PAR processes; and (5) cross-generational collaborations are crucial to long-term benefits. Key challenges that confront PAR processes include the need for time and resources over longer periods; the complexity of multi-actor process facilitation; and institutional barriers within the academy and development organizations, which prevent shifting investment towards integrated PAR agroecological processes.
ໝວດໝູ່ນິເວດກະສິກຳ
  • ລະບົບປະສົມປະສານ
  • ຫຼຸດຜ່ອນປັດໄຈການຜະລິດ ແລະ ນຳກັບມາໃຊ້ໃໝ່
  • ສຸຂະພາບດິນ
  • ເສດຖະກິດ ແລະ ລາຍຮັບ
  • ສຸຂະພາບ ແລະ ໂພສະນາການ
  • ລະບົບອາຫານທີ່ຍືນຍົງ
  • ຊີວະນາໆພັນ
  • ສະພາບອາກາດ
  • ການຮ່ວມມື
  • ທຶນ
  • ຄວາມຮູ້ ແລະ ຄຸນຄ່າ
ຄໍາສໍາຄັນດ້ານນິເວດວິທະຍາ
    ອົງການຈັດຕັ້ງປະກອບສ່ວນ MDPI
    ຜູ້ຂຽນ V. Ernesto Méndez, Martha Caswell, Stephen R. Gliessman and Roseann Cohen
    ປີ 2017
    ປະເພດຂອງເອກະສານ Research Article
    ພາສາ ພາສາອັງກິດ
    ຂໍ້ມູນພື້ນທີ່
    ປະເທດ Latin America
    ລະດັບບໍລິຫານ 1
    ລະດັບບໍລິຫານ 2
    Web Link