Integrating Agroecology and Participatory Action Research (PAR). Lessons from Central America

This article aims to: (1) analyze the key characteristics and principles of two case studies that integrated PAR and agroecology in Central America; and (2) learn from the lessons offered by these case studies, as well as others from the literature,onhowtobetterintegratePARandagroecology.KeyprinciplesidentifiedforeffectivePAR agroecological processes include a shared interest in research by partners, a belief in collective power/action, a commitment to participation, practicing humility and establishing trust and accountability. Important lessons to consider for future work include: (1) research processes that did not start as PAR, can evolve into it; (2) farmer/stakeholder participation in setting the research agenda, from the outset, results in higher engagement and enhanced outcomes; (3) having the right partners for the desired outcomes is key; (4) intentional and explicit reflection is an essential component of PAR processes; and (5) cross-generational collaborations are crucial to long-term benefits. Key challenges that confront PAR processes include the need for time and resources over longer periods; the complexity of multi-actor process facilitation; and institutional barriers within the academy and development organizations, which prevent shifting investment towards integrated PAR agroecological processes.

Dữ liệu và nguồn

Thông tin khác

Miền Giá trị
loại hình sản phẩm của ALiSEA Không
Tiêu đề Integrating Agroecology and Participatory Action Research (PAR). Lessons from Central America
Mô tả This article aims to: (1) analyze the key characteristics and principles of two case studies that integrated PAR and agroecology in Central America; and (2) learn from the lessons offered by these case studies, as well as others from the literature,onhowtobetterintegratePARandagroecology.KeyprinciplesidentifiedforeffectivePAR agroecological processes include a shared interest in research by partners, a belief in collective power/action, a commitment to participation, practicing humility and establishing trust and accountability. Important lessons to consider for future work include: (1) research processes that did not start as PAR, can evolve into it; (2) farmer/stakeholder participation in setting the research agenda, from the outset, results in higher engagement and enhanced outcomes; (3) having the right partners for the desired outcomes is key; (4) intentional and explicit reflection is an essential component of PAR processes; and (5) cross-generational collaborations are crucial to long-term benefits. Key challenges that confront PAR processes include the need for time and resources over longer periods; the complexity of multi-actor process facilitation; and institutional barriers within the academy and development organizations, which prevent shifting investment towards integrated PAR agroecological processes.
Lĩnh vực Nông nghiệp sinh thái
  • Hệ thống tích hợp
  • Giảm đầu vào và tái chế
  • Sức khỏe đất
  • Kinh tế và thu nhập
  • Dinh dưỡng và chế độ ăn uống
  • Hệ thống thực phẩm bền vững
  • Đa dạng sinh học
  • Khí hậu
  • Hợp tác
  • Công bằng
  • Kiến thức và giá trị
Từ khóa nông sinh thái
    Các tổ chức đóng góp MDPI
    Tác giả V. Ernesto Méndez, Martha Caswell, Stephen R. Gliessman and Roseann Cohen
    Năm 2017
    Loại tài liệu Research Article
    Ngôn ngữ Tiếng anh
    Thông tin không gian
    Quốc gia Latin America
    Cấp hành chính 1
    Cấp hành chính 2
    Web Link