Thông tin khác

Miền Giá trị
Data last updated 14 tháng 11, 2025
Metadata last updated 14 tháng 11, 2025
Được tạo ra 14 tháng 11, 2025
Định dạng PDF
Giấy phép Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 4.0
Datastore activeFalse
Datastore contains all records of source fileFalse
Has viewsTrue
Idec900dfa-207c-447a-8d82-540410b25cd3
Mimetypeapplication/pdf
Name translated{'en': 'Challenges for the institutionalization of agroecology in the Lao PDR', 'km': 'Challenges for the institutionalization of agroecology in the Lao PDR', 'lo': 'Challenges for the institutionalization of agroecology in the Lao PDR', 'my_MM': 'Challenges for the institutionalization of agroecology in the Lao PDR', 'vi': 'Challenges for the institutionalization of agroecology in the Lao PDR'}
Package id1bdaa9c6-d8f1-414e-8998-497243add93d
Position0
Resource description{'en': '-Agroecology has gained greater political recognition through the Lao facilitated Initiative on Agroecology for\r\nASEAN (LICA) \r\n\r\n-The policy framework supporting agroecological transition has been strengthened in recent years but public\r\npolicies still lack concrete instruments to encourage agroecological transition. \r\n\r\n-At local level, concrete actions supporting agroecology transition have been successfully implemented but are\r\nhighly dependent on projects. Their lifespan may be limited if international support is withdrawn. \r\n\r\n-Policies supporting agroecology transition are still based on a narrowing representation of agroecology,\r\nfocusing more on changing agricultural practices than on a profound transformation of the food system. \r\n\r\n-The broad dimension of agroecology (including social, gender, youth… dimensions) is not well institutionalized \r\n\r\n-Various policies still support unsustainable cash-crops development\r\n', 'km': '-Agroecology has gained greater political recognition through the Lao facilitated Initiative on Agroecology for\r\nASEAN (LICA) \r\n\r\n-The policy framework supporting agroecological transition has been strengthened in recent years but public\r\npolicies still lack concrete instruments to encourage agroecological transition. \r\n\r\n-At local level, concrete actions supporting agroecology transition have been successfully implemented but are\r\nhighly dependent on projects. Their lifespan may be limited if international support is withdrawn. \r\n\r\n-Policies supporting agroecology transition are still based on a narrowing representation of agroecology,\r\nfocusing more on changing agricultural practices than on a profound transformation of the food system. \r\n\r\n-The broad dimension of agroecology (including social, gender, youth… dimensions) is not well institutionalized \r\n\r\n-Various policies still support unsustainable cash-crops development\r\n', 'lo': '-Agroecology has gained greater political recognition through the Lao facilitated Initiative on Agroecology for\r\nASEAN (LICA) \r\n\r\n-The policy framework supporting agroecological transition has been strengthened in recent years but public\r\npolicies still lack concrete instruments to encourage agroecological transition. \r\n\r\n-At local level, concrete actions supporting agroecology transition have been successfully implemented but are\r\nhighly dependent on projects. Their lifespan may be limited if international support is withdrawn. \r\n\r\n-Policies supporting agroecology transition are still based on a narrowing representation of agroecology,\r\nfocusing more on changing agricultural practices than on a profound transformation of the food system. \r\n\r\n-The broad dimension of agroecology (including social, gender, youth… dimensions) is not well institutionalized \r\n\r\n-Various policies still support unsustainable cash-crops development\r\n', 'my_MM': '-Agroecology has gained greater political recognition through the Lao facilitated Initiative on Agroecology for\r\nASEAN (LICA) \r\n\r\n-The policy framework supporting agroecological transition has been strengthened in recent years but public\r\npolicies still lack concrete instruments to encourage agroecological transition. \r\n\r\n-At local level, concrete actions supporting agroecology transition have been successfully implemented but are\r\nhighly dependent on projects. Their lifespan may be limited if international support is withdrawn. \r\n\r\n-Policies supporting agroecology transition are still based on a narrowing representation of agroecology,\r\nfocusing more on changing agricultural practices than on a profound transformation of the food system. \r\n\r\n-The broad dimension of agroecology (including social, gender, youth… dimensions) is not well institutionalized \r\n\r\n-Various policies still support unsustainable cash-crops development\r\n', 'vi': '-Agroecology has gained greater political recognition through the Lao facilitated Initiative on Agroecology for\r\nASEAN (LICA) \r\n\r\n-The policy framework supporting agroecological transition has been strengthened in recent years but public\r\npolicies still lack concrete instruments to encourage agroecological transition. \r\n\r\n-At local level, concrete actions supporting agroecology transition have been successfully implemented but are\r\nhighly dependent on projects. Their lifespan may be limited if international support is withdrawn. \r\n\r\n-Policies supporting agroecology transition are still based on a narrowing representation of agroecology,\r\nfocusing more on changing agricultural practices than on a profound transformation of the food system. \r\n\r\n-The broad dimension of agroecology (including social, gender, youth… dimensions) is not well institutionalized \r\n\r\n-Various policies still support unsustainable cash-crops development\r\n'}
Size1,1 MiB
Stateactive
Url typeupload
Tên Challenges for the institutionalization of agroecology in the Lao PDR
Sự miêu tả

-Agroecology has gained greater political recognition through the Lao facilitated Initiative on Agroecology for ASEAN (LICA)

-The policy framework supporting agroecological transition has been strengthened in recent years but public policies still lack concrete instruments to encourage agroecological transition.

-At local level, concrete actions supporting agroecology transition have been successfully implemented but are highly dependent on projects. Their lifespan may be limited if international support is withdrawn.

-Policies supporting agroecology transition are still based on a narrowing representation of agroecology, focusing more on changing agricultural practices than on a profound transformation of the food system.

-The broad dimension of agroecology (including social, gender, youth… dimensions) is not well institutionalized

-Various policies still support unsustainable cash-crops development