နောက်ဆက်တွဲ သတင်းအချက်အလက်များ

Field တန်ဖိုး
နောက်ဆုံး ပြင်ဆင်ခဲ့သော ဒေတာ 2025- နိုဝင်ဘာ 14
နောက်ဆုံး ပြင်ဆင်ခဲ့သော metadata 2025- နိုဝင်ဘာ 14
ဖန်တီးခဲ့သော အချိန် 2025- နိုဝင်ဘာ 14
ပုံစံ PDF
လိုင်စင် Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 4.0
Datastore activeFalse
Datastore contains all records of source fileFalse
Has viewsTrue
Idec900dfa-207c-447a-8d82-540410b25cd3
Mimetypeapplication/pdf
Name translated{'en': 'Challenges for the institutionalization of agroecology in the Lao PDR', 'km': 'Challenges for the institutionalization of agroecology in the Lao PDR', 'lo': 'Challenges for the institutionalization of agroecology in the Lao PDR', 'my_MM': 'Challenges for the institutionalization of agroecology in the Lao PDR', 'vi': 'Challenges for the institutionalization of agroecology in the Lao PDR'}
Package id1bdaa9c6-d8f1-414e-8998-497243add93d
Position0
Resource description{'en': '-Agroecology has gained greater political recognition through the Lao facilitated Initiative on Agroecology for\r\nASEAN (LICA) \r\n\r\n-The policy framework supporting agroecological transition has been strengthened in recent years but public\r\npolicies still lack concrete instruments to encourage agroecological transition. \r\n\r\n-At local level, concrete actions supporting agroecology transition have been successfully implemented but are\r\nhighly dependent on projects. Their lifespan may be limited if international support is withdrawn. \r\n\r\n-Policies supporting agroecology transition are still based on a narrowing representation of agroecology,\r\nfocusing more on changing agricultural practices than on a profound transformation of the food system. \r\n\r\n-The broad dimension of agroecology (including social, gender, youth… dimensions) is not well institutionalized \r\n\r\n-Various policies still support unsustainable cash-crops development\r\n', 'km': '-Agroecology has gained greater political recognition through the Lao facilitated Initiative on Agroecology for\r\nASEAN (LICA) \r\n\r\n-The policy framework supporting agroecological transition has been strengthened in recent years but public\r\npolicies still lack concrete instruments to encourage agroecological transition. \r\n\r\n-At local level, concrete actions supporting agroecology transition have been successfully implemented but are\r\nhighly dependent on projects. Their lifespan may be limited if international support is withdrawn. \r\n\r\n-Policies supporting agroecology transition are still based on a narrowing representation of agroecology,\r\nfocusing more on changing agricultural practices than on a profound transformation of the food system. \r\n\r\n-The broad dimension of agroecology (including social, gender, youth… dimensions) is not well institutionalized \r\n\r\n-Various policies still support unsustainable cash-crops development\r\n', 'lo': '-Agroecology has gained greater political recognition through the Lao facilitated Initiative on Agroecology for\r\nASEAN (LICA) \r\n\r\n-The policy framework supporting agroecological transition has been strengthened in recent years but public\r\npolicies still lack concrete instruments to encourage agroecological transition. \r\n\r\n-At local level, concrete actions supporting agroecology transition have been successfully implemented but are\r\nhighly dependent on projects. Their lifespan may be limited if international support is withdrawn. \r\n\r\n-Policies supporting agroecology transition are still based on a narrowing representation of agroecology,\r\nfocusing more on changing agricultural practices than on a profound transformation of the food system. \r\n\r\n-The broad dimension of agroecology (including social, gender, youth… dimensions) is not well institutionalized \r\n\r\n-Various policies still support unsustainable cash-crops development\r\n', 'my_MM': '-Agroecology has gained greater political recognition through the Lao facilitated Initiative on Agroecology for\r\nASEAN (LICA) \r\n\r\n-The policy framework supporting agroecological transition has been strengthened in recent years but public\r\npolicies still lack concrete instruments to encourage agroecological transition. \r\n\r\n-At local level, concrete actions supporting agroecology transition have been successfully implemented but are\r\nhighly dependent on projects. Their lifespan may be limited if international support is withdrawn. \r\n\r\n-Policies supporting agroecology transition are still based on a narrowing representation of agroecology,\r\nfocusing more on changing agricultural practices than on a profound transformation of the food system. \r\n\r\n-The broad dimension of agroecology (including social, gender, youth… dimensions) is not well institutionalized \r\n\r\n-Various policies still support unsustainable cash-crops development\r\n', 'vi': '-Agroecology has gained greater political recognition through the Lao facilitated Initiative on Agroecology for\r\nASEAN (LICA) \r\n\r\n-The policy framework supporting agroecological transition has been strengthened in recent years but public\r\npolicies still lack concrete instruments to encourage agroecological transition. \r\n\r\n-At local level, concrete actions supporting agroecology transition have been successfully implemented but are\r\nhighly dependent on projects. Their lifespan may be limited if international support is withdrawn. \r\n\r\n-Policies supporting agroecology transition are still based on a narrowing representation of agroecology,\r\nfocusing more on changing agricultural practices than on a profound transformation of the food system. \r\n\r\n-The broad dimension of agroecology (including social, gender, youth… dimensions) is not well institutionalized \r\n\r\n-Various policies still support unsustainable cash-crops development\r\n'}
Size1.1 MiB
Stateactive
Url typeupload
နာမည် Challenges for the institutionalization of agroecology in the Lao PDR
ဖော်ပြချက်

-Agroecology has gained greater political recognition through the Lao facilitated Initiative on Agroecology for ASEAN (LICA)

-The policy framework supporting agroecological transition has been strengthened in recent years but public policies still lack concrete instruments to encourage agroecological transition.

-At local level, concrete actions supporting agroecology transition have been successfully implemented but are highly dependent on projects. Their lifespan may be limited if international support is withdrawn.

-Policies supporting agroecology transition are still based on a narrowing representation of agroecology, focusing more on changing agricultural practices than on a profound transformation of the food system.

-The broad dimension of agroecology (including social, gender, youth… dimensions) is not well institutionalized

-Various policies still support unsustainable cash-crops development